Thursday, September 24th, 2026.
Welcome to Quests Daily | Your Compass for the Day in Travel.
The Lead Story: Iran’s Flight Cancellations Show How Sanctions Can Shut Routes Without Closing Airspace
Iranian carriers are beginning to lose international operating access as new U.S. aviation sanctions take effect. Iran’s Civil Aviation Organization said flights to Baghdad and Muscat would be cancelled from midnight on September 23 after the two airports stopped accepting Iranian services. Authorities are negotiating to redirect Baghdad-bound flights to Najaf, while talks with Oman are also continuing. Other international services, including Istanbul, were expected to operate as scheduled. The cancellations follow a September 8 U.S. Treasury action that designated 27 Iranian airlines and other aviation-linked entities, expanding sanctions from individual carriers and transactions toward a much broader restriction on Iran’s commercial aviation sector.
The operating pressure comes from services airlines need on the ground, not from an internationally imposed closure of Iranian aircraft from foreign airspace. The U.S. has threatened secondary sanctions against companies providing Iranian carriers with services such as fuel, ground handling and ticketing, exposing overseas suppliers to potential consequences if they continue supporting those flights. That changes route viability quickly: an airline may retain traffic rights and aircraft capacity but still be unable to operate if airports, fuel providers or handling companies withdraw support. Baghdad and Muscat are the first visible examples, while the attempted diversion to Najaf shows how networks may have to be rebuilt airport by airport as service availability changes. The result is a less predictable international schedule, with connectivity increasingly determined by whether each destination’s aviation supply chain is willing and able to service Iranian aircraft.
The Briefing:
British Airways Goes Three-a-Day on Delhi–London:
British Airways has added a third daily Delhi–London Heathrow service, taking its India winter operation to as many as 70 flights a week. More frequency gives BA additional schedule choice and a wider set of connection combinations through Heathrow, strengthening the network proposition beyond the nonstop seat itself.Gujarat and Darjeeling Land on Lonely Planet’s 2027 List:
Gujarat was selected among Lonely Planet’s 25 destinations for 2027, while the Darjeeling Himalayan Railway made its list of 25 travel experiences. The exposure gives India two different products to merchandise internationally: a broad multi-stop destination and a specific heritage experience capable of anchoring a wider itinerary.SpiceJet’s August Reliability Gap Widens:
SpiceJet recorded 17.9% on-time performance across the 10 major airports covered by August’s traffic data, alongside a 20.92% cancellation rate; 48.05% of its flights were delayed by more than two hours. At those levels, reliability becomes part of the fare comparison itself rather than a post-booking service issue.
Air India Wants the Seatback Screen to Become a Storefront
What happened: Air India has previewed Vista Digital Platform, an in-house inflight software system connecting entertainment, loyalty, commerce and travel services through the seatback screen. Deployment is planned from the second half of 2027, beginning with select new aircraft before expanding across the fleet. The platform will work with Air India’s app, website and backend systems, support over-the-air updates and eventually allow passengers to access loyalty, travel and selected booking-related services onboard.
Why it matters: Conventional inflight entertainment largely sits apart from the airline’s other digital channels. Vista is designed to make the cabin another part of Air India’s connected customer journey, while reducing the problem of different interfaces across different aircraft and hardware systems. Its planned “commerce-on-map” feature could allow passengers to discover and book destination experiences during a flight, while personalisation can carry across journeys. That gives Air India more control over how onboard attention connects with loyalty, ancillary products and destination commerce, moving the seatback screen beyond entertainment and into distribution.
Visual- Stat of the Day:
Takeaway: Domestic airlines carried 121.26 lakh passengers in August, down 6.34% from July’s 129.47 lakh. The softer month also came with weaker aircraft utilisation: IndiGo’s load factor dropped to 79.2%, Air India Group’s to 77%, Akasa Air’s to 87.6% and SpiceJet’s to 79.9%. January-August domestic traffic was 0.18% below the same period last year, so the weakness is not only a month-on-month comparison. Air India Group gained passengers and market share during August, but its load factor still fell 6.2 percentage points. Capacity and competitive share are moving differently from underlying demand, putting greater weight on how efficiently airlines fill the seats already in the market.
Booking Anxiety Is Becoming a Checkout Problem:
Case: Research conducted by Phocuswright and WiT on behalf of Protect Group found that more than half of APAC travellers and at least 45% of travellers in Europe and the U.S. had experienced a travel or event disruption during the previous 12 months. Travellers responded by researching longer, choosing refundable products, buying insurance, avoiding some trips or events and booking closer to departure. The research identifies checkout as the point where anxiety is highest.
Where it helps: Refund flexibility can therefore influence conversion before it becomes a customer-service issue. The research found different regional preferences: APAC respondents showed greater interest in a cheaper base product with optional refund protection, while U.S. and European respondents leaned more toward a higher price that already includes free cancellation. That creates room to merchandise flexibility as part of the product architecture rather than hiding it inside fare conditions. The research also reported a higher stated likelihood of platform reuse among consumers offered refund protection in the U.S., U.K. and China.
Risk: The study was conducted on behalf of Protect Group and the article is partner content, so its commercial findings should be treated as reported consumer preferences rather than proof that refund protection itself produces repeat bookings. The regional split also argues against one standard global offer: flexibility can reduce booking friction, but the price and packaging still need to match how customers in each market value cancellation protection.
See you tomorrow with more such insights, if you have been forwarded this email, don’t forget to subscribe to Quests.Travel
Quick question about newsletter ads
We’re running a super short survey to see if our newsletter ads are being noticed. It takes about 20 seconds and there's just a few easy questions.
Your feedback helps us make smarter, better ads.